Skip to Main Content

Delivery Results using Quality Management

Delivering results relies on maintaining a strong focus on what is important and setting and managing priorities. There must be a structured approach to managing quality both at a local level but also at scale, where needed, to improve the health and wellbeing for the local population. There are 3 core quality functions that need to be delivered as described in the Juran Trilogy, Quality Planning, Quality Control and Quality Improvement,. The functions are not neatly separated in practice and should be closely linked to each other. Central to this is a need to align to operating models and reframe strategic focus on quality and outcomes along with a commitment for openness and shared learning.

Create vision & plan for quality

The case for quality needs to be at the heart of the planning cycle ensuring there is an understanding of the patient and service users’ needs and expectations and systematic approaches for improvement are adopted to accelerate results. There should be a clear vision for quality across the organisation that is understood by everyone. Effective quality planning helps teams and services identify their priorities and enables testing of interventions to deliver improvements. Setting quality priorities should be guide by insights from staff, service users and organisational intelligence ensuring a proactive approach to future challenges.

Leverage existing knowledge across organisations to identify aligned opportunities for improvement

Leveraging existing knowledge and insights helps teams and organisations understand what matters most. The ability to pull together data and information from multiple sources creates knowledge management and informed decision making. Knowledge management involves identifying, capturing, and utilizing both explicit knowledge (formalized and documented) and tacit knowledge (personal insights and expertise) possessed by individuals, teams patients and service users. The main goal of this approach is to create a learning environment in which new knowledge is continually generated, shared, used and improved. Planning needs to consider the organisational and professional  vision to align clear goals for improvement with a focus on those issues which will have the biggest impact. Data should be used to plan internal strategic and local improvement priorities through the local operating cycle based on evidence based practice.

Best Practice Guidance How to evidence this
  • Professional fora leverage intelligence to agree quality metrics based on:
    • patient outcome intelligence/data
    • morbidity and mortality Reviews
    • inspection reports
    • incidents
    • surveys
    • audits
    • Professional KPI’s
    • Patients and service user  feedback
    • Staff feedback
    • Retrospective safe staffing data
    • Professional reviews
    • Best practice frameworks
    • Others
  • Professional Leaders agree core quality indicators for local and regional measurement and monitoring
  • Professional leaders agree specialty specific improvement priorities
  • There is evidence of quality data sets across every care and service setting
  • Patients, staff and service users have access to real time experience feedback tools
  • Staffing and skill mix reviews are clearly documented and regularly reviewed
  • Outcome of review of appropriate professional behaviours, action plans and progress reports
  • There is regular analysis and reporting to EDON’s
  • Themes are identified and shared locally and regionally to inform improvement priorities
  • Professional priorities are included in operational planning business and plans

Ensure Quality control through shared governance

Controlling quality through shared governance engages front line teams in the role of leading quality excellence creating the structure for staff to participate in the decision making process. Measuring and monitoring agreed metrics is complex and multi-faceted, yet vitally important if we hope to establish learning systems with a focus on improvement within and across professions. The integration of information and data must be carried out at different levels of the organisation and across the wider regional system. Some issues are primarily relevant to a particular ward/team or department and should be resolved at that level, only escalating when they prove intractable. This enables good quality control where the people closest to the work have the knowledge, tools and procedures in place to review, reflect and more importantly react, with immediacy, to discrepancies between observed – and agreed – improved levels of performance. Boards need more generic information that has been previously analysed to reflect higher level trends and patterns while regional leaders also need information to inform policy, strategic decisions and forward planning.

Promote professional accountability and assurance

Professional accountability is a commitment that you make to yourself and your career when you become a nurse, midwife or AHP  to advance, grow, improve, and adapt to your work. Organisations have a duty to provide safe, high quality care underpinned by accountability and ensuring transparency is included as a critical principle of good governance. People need to be confident about the quality of care they receive from organisations who are providing health and social care.  They want services that are readily accessible, are safe, and are provided by competent and confident staff who will always work in their best interests. In order to deliver this nurses, midwives and AHP’s need to have control of their data providing oversight of how their system is performing. Daily visual management of data combined with the empowerment and involvement of staff in decision-making will ensure professional accountability and assurance.

Best Practice Guidance How to evidence this
  • There are visible professional accountability structures within and across teams
  • Shared governance approaches provide a collective voice for shared decision making
  • Data should be accessible and visible across all areas
  • Accountability processes outline responsibility for analyzing and reporting data
    • At frontline
    • Senior Professionals
    • Board
    • Regional Professional and Accountability Fora
  • Escalation systems are established to share information internally and externally through professional fora
  • Digital tools are maximised to support real-time data and inform decision making
  • Time-series charts are used (where applicable) to enable an understanding of variation in care and processes

 

  • Nurses, midwives and AHP’s are represented on all decision making fora where practice and workforce issues are discussed e.g. service reconfiguration, HR policies, service developments
  • Staff at all levels are included in internal Trust accountability and governance processes
  • There are clear decision making processes within local integrated governance frameworks
  • Data is accessible and analysed using time series charts across all areas
  • Staff have an understanding of how to interpret time series charts

Develop and improvement learning system

Developing an Improvement Learning System is about coming together around a common challenge, testing new ideas that can make a difference, reflecting and learning to make things better. The foundation of a learning system is a community that connects and influences people and develops their understanding leading to better outcomes for populations. It requires a culture that values curiosity, continuous learning, improvement, and innovation. Achieving and sustaining learning systems requires commitment  across organisations and people along with a supporting infrastructure to bring individuals and teams together.

Focus on local and regional improvement priorities enabling participation, collaboration & learning

In almost every part of our lives we are inundated with information and often find difficulty in identifying our priorities and focusing on what is most important. Improvement won’t happen unless people take action using local knowledge along with data to create a sense of purpose and intent. Generating priorities for improvement that resonate with people and are connected to the strategic organisational vision are those that will deliver the best outcomes. Bringing teams together to enable knowledge sharing is critical to enable the scale of best practices across (and up and down) organizations.

Best Practice Guidance How to evidence this
  • Improvement priorities are identified based on data relating to outcomes and standards of care
  • Improvement work is sponsored and aligned to regional and organisational priorities
  • Frontline staff and people with lived experience are leading improvement together
  • Staff actively engage in regional networked collaborative approaches to support the learning system
  • Mechanisms are in place to connect professionals within and across organisations
  • Support is in place to scale up improvement
  • Processes are in place to recognise and reward local improvement building momentum and encouraging continuous learning
  • Staff are encouraged and supported to share their work regionally, nationally and internationally

 

  • Professional improvement priorities are identified as part of the annual planning cycle
  • There is evidence of partnership with people with lived experience on all suitable improvement initiatives
  • Staff actively participate in regional improvement collaboratives
  • Staff at all levels are supported to engage in local, regional and national networks/communities of practice
  • Improvement coaching support is readily available for all staff
  • Staff are encouraged to present their work at conferences and events
  • Staff are supported to write up their initiatives in preparation for publication

Resources

Related Pages/See Also/Explore More/Other Sections